Image courtesy of Prisoners’ Legal Services website

Per the New York Times July 1, a searchable table for clusters in Massachusetts and found 6 in the top 17 are in prisons and jails:

Massachusetts Correctional Institution-Shirley — Shirley, Mass.	193
Soldiers Home in Holyoke veterans center and hospital — Holyoke, Mass.	161
Massachusetts Treatment Center prison — Bridgewater, Mass.	149
Heritage Hall West Building nursing home — Agawam, Mass.	148
St. Patrick’s Manor retirement community — Framingham, Mass.	113
Biogen conference — Boston, Mass.	109
Massachusetts Correctional Institution- Framingham — Framingham, Mass.	99
Essex County Correctional Facility — Middleton, Mass.	92
Wingate nursing home — Chestnut Hill, Mass.	87
Wingate at Harwich nursing and rehab — Harwich, Mass.	83
Walmart store — Worcester, Mass.	81
Bristol County House of Correction and Jail — North Dartmouth, Mass.	75
Middlesex Jail & House of Correction — Billerica, Mass.	72
Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Beverly, Mass.	70
Beaumont Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing — Northbridge, Mass.	63
Beaumont Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing — Northborough, Mass.	62
Beaumont Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing — Westborough, Mass.	60

From PLS, I am printing their whole statement to the class action lawsuit decision by the Supreme Judicial Court. Although the injunction was denied, it’s clear that the lockdown could, at a later time, be deemed illegal and considered cruel and unusual punichment. It’s a loss for Massachusetts now, but we need to keep fighting and saying that emergency actions ARE needed to decarcerate our prisons and jails–from their press release:

MA Supreme Judicial Court Issues Mixed Ruling in PLS COVID-19 Release Case Positive Action on Section 35; Bulk of Case Remanded 

(Boston, MA) The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court today issued a mixed decision on the emergency request for a preliminary injunction in Foster v. Mici, the Prisoners’ Legal Services (PLS) lawsuit on behalf of incarcerated people who seek release to mitigate the dangerous spread of COVID-19 in the state’s jails and prisons.

While the Court acknowledged at length that conditions in Department of Correction (DOC) facilities – a two-month long lockdown, lack of the ability to socially distance, inconsistent sanitation – are concerning, and agreed that fewer people in custody would help ameliorate conditions, they put off the decision to order immediate releases, instead transferring the case as an emergency matter to the Superior Court for further fact-finding and litigation.

“We are disappointed that today’s ruling declined to order releases at this time,” said Elizabeth Matos, Executive Director of PLS. “Over 600 incarcerated people in our state are COVID positive right now and those rising numbers are despite inadequate testing. Our clients in the DOC have been enduring eight straight weeks of solitary confinement conditions and have only recently been allowed to get a few minutes a week of fresh air. In addition to a public health crisis, there is a serious mental health crisis in our prisons and jails. COVID protocols are also preventing clients from even accessing basic medical care. Without releases, the dangerous conditions we are seeing now will only escalate.”

“The Executive branch has failed to meaningfully act on the fact that incarcerated people simply cannot use the single most important tool we have – social distancing – to protect themselves from coronavirus,” continued Matos. “That failure is a clear statement about how little we, as a Commonwealth, value the lives of people in prison, who are disproportionately people of color and people struggling with mental health issues. At a time when the value of black and brown lives is being painfully contested on the street, not to demand better and not to expect better is to accept that these lives don’t matter.”

It is significant, however, that the Court ordered the Superior Court proceedings to be expedited; and took positive action to provide immediate relief for people who have been civilly committed to prisoners and jails under M.G.L c. 123 Section 35, due to substance use disorder rather than a crime.

The Court ordered that no person can be committed under Section 35 unless the judge determines that the danger posed by the substance use disorder outweighs the high risk of COVID transmission in an institutional setting; and held that all who are now committed under Section 35 can seek immediate release through motions to reconsider, and that these motions must be decided within two days.

“We do think there’s plenty of evidence right now to justify releases,” said Matos. “Moreover, the court recognized that the inhumane conditions under which people are now imprisoned, essentially solitary confinement, could be found to be cruel and unusual, thus unconstitutional, in the proceedings that will now take place in the Superior Court.

The Court wrote:
“…the lockdown conditions instituted by the DOC to prevent a serious risk of harm themselves risk becoming Eighth Amendment violations. The CDC’s interim guidance notes that measures taken by correction facilities to reduce transmission of COVID-19, such as canceling activities and visitation, may be deleterious to the mental health of inmates. These effects necessarily will be even more pronounced for inmates in solitary cells, who are segregated from all other humans for twenty-three or more hours per day.”

Matos said, “We admire and commend the tireless advocacy of family members, community organizations, incarcerated and formerly incarcerated people, and urge folks not to give up hope. This case will continue and we will continue to stand with you all until the cry for basic human rights is heard.”

Prisoners’ Legal Services promotes the safe, humane, and lawful treatment of Massachusetts prisoners through civil rights litigation, administrative advocacy, client counseling, and outreach to policy makers and the public.
# # # 

It was Tamir Rice’s death in 2014 that got my colleague and I to stand out in front of the college where we taught, with signs, protesting the death by police of yet another black man. 

#BlackLivesMatter had been a rallying cry for some time in cities across the country and in some smaller towns, but we felt at our community college, the students, immersed in their own struggles, needed to be reminded about a movement that was shaking up the nation. Just a few months before, Eric Garner’s last words, “I can’t breathe” had been blasted across our consciosuness. His name too was on our signs. 

A famous video had caught the horrific death of Garner as he was thrown to the ground by Officer Daniel Panteleo.

                                   A screenshot of the tackled Garner by police

It seemed impossible to believe that the Staten Island grand jury did not indict NYPD police officer Daniel Pantaleo on December 3, but then I am a white woman and have not lived with such racist attacks on my body, my family, or my community. Crowds in New York City and San Francisco gathered in protest. I joined thousands in downtown Boston who gathered on the Boston Common, and then marched in the downtown area. Many blocked traffic, trying desperately to bring America’s attention to the injustice of this.

The documentary, American Trial: The Eric Garner Story also tries to show the injustice of this time in our recent history. It calls itself “an unscripted courtroom drama” as it presents the case against NYPD officer Panteleo. It is effective in building tension, making us, the audience want a verdict of “Guilty” but it does not provide an answer. Instead after the trial, it invites the audience to make its own decision. I found this a bit unsatisfying but it’s a good marketing tool, driving an audience to decide.

If you watch the film on the 20-21st, you can vote on the verdict via online ballot here. Results will be announced May 21 during a Livestream Q&A with director Roee Messinger and Esaw Snipes Garner, Garner’s widow. Otherwise, the film has a limited run and you can find event listings here.

But in spite of its open ended approach to the trial that never happened, the documentary is worth watching. It presents an incredibly realistic trial and uses defense attorneys, retired cops, one of the medical experts who consulted on the case, a good friend of Garner’s and a very honest and heart-broken Esaw Snipes Garner. An actor, Anthony Altieri, plays Pantaleo and is fairly neutral intentionally. You don’t hate him exactly but you see how he is part of a larger system that has no interest in justice.

The documentary reminds us of the ways the criminal legal system twists words, justifies actions, and turns truth on its head so easily. Especially when it involves the life of an unarmed Black young man.

Is NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo guilty as charged? Is this really a question?

Today, May 20th, would have been Michael Brown’s twenty-fourth birthday.